Current News
Twitter to RA.
I'll be checking twitter throughout the hour during every show. You can send in comments and questions by direct messaging @rationalalchemy
Your Pod-Casts
Would you like to pod-cast on Rational Alchemy? Tell me the rules and how do I do it? Follow this link.
| Rational Alchemy 03/27/2010 Released |
|
|
| Main Page - Rational Alchemy : Blogs, Musings and News | |||
| Written by Brian Walsh | |||
| Monday, 29 March 2010 22:08 | |||
|
This week we were joined by Anita Ikonen, a paranormal claimant and burgeoning skeptic. On November 21st, 2009 The Independent Investigations Group tested Anita's claim to be able to determine the absence of a kidney in humans using possible paranormal powers.
Read more about the test here: http://www.iigwest.org/anitaikonen.html
And find out more about Anita here: http://www.visionfromfeeling.com/
Download file:Information Filename: ra03272010.mp3 Filesize: 38365525 Kb
|
No Libel Laws in Science

The use of the English libel laws to silence critical discussion of medical practice and scientific evidence discourages debate, denies the public access to the full picture and encourages use of the courts to silence critics. The British Chiropractic Association has sued Simon Singh for libel. The scientific community would have preferred that it had defended its position about chiropractic through an open discussion in the medical literature or mainstream media.




Andy - I saw that site before and during the recording of the show. I looks more to me like a site where it's all about personal insults of JREF moderators and Anita herself. Very little in there dealing with Critical Thinking.
It also totally fails to mention that during her tests at IIG out of three groups of 6 people she correctly choose the correct person twice and in one instance the correct side of missing kidney.
So she is hitting well above chance rate and is worthy of further investigations.
Mathamatically and forgetting the which side is the kidney on part of the test. 3 groups of 6 people. This is like guessing the powerball so the odds of guessing correctly are 1/216 - Anita correctly guessed 2 people, so like the way the odds in the powerball work this actually equates to a chance of 5/216 - another way of looking at this is that she had a 2.3% chance of even getting 2 out of the three groups correct.
It's only when you crunch the numbers do you realize how well she actually did. Does this mean she has this ability, of course not. People do win the Powerball. But as I said, worthy of a better investigation.